SU just received its 3rd LB commit of the season. While LB is a huge need, I hope we dont just throw numbers at the position. We need help everywhere. If we bring in too many LBs this year, it will cause a roster imbalance that will end up hurting other positions down the line. Including our verbals, here is a breakdown of the roster:
QBs
2010 3
2011 3
2012 3
QB seems fine number wise. But talent may require another QB this year.
RBs
2010 3
2011 2
2012 1
We absolutely need an RB in this years class, maybe even 2.
FBs
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
Will we even use FBs? Do we combo this with TE?
WRs
2010 7
2011 4
2012 2
WR need one more this year and but more likely 2.
TEs
2010 3
2011 3
2012 1
We really need 2 TEs this year, especially ones that can block.
OL
2010 13
2011 7
2012 5
We need a bunch of OLmen both in numbers and more importantly talent. Likely 3 more this year.
DEs
2010 7
2011 6
2012 5
If the talent is there we dont really need more than 1 DE in this class.
DTs
2010 6
2011 3
2012 2
We need 2 DTs this year.
LBs
2010 12
2011 9
2012 8
If we keep the 3 verbals we currently have, numbers wise we have too many LBs. But talent is another question. You have to think some of these guys go DE or TE.
CBs
2010 6
2011 4
2012 3
We need some help here. Likely 2.
Ss
2010 6
2011 4
2012 2
Definitely need one, likely 2.
K
2010 1
2011 1
2012 1
There are two good Ks on our radar, gotta think we take 1.
P
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
You almost have to take a punter.
So in total it looks like we need about 20 more players to fill holes. Which means we have more holes than current available schollies. I doubt we see any more LBs taken. It wont be easy of Marrone to juggle around talent and depth needs.
So long, farewell
King Otto III
1st-quarter INTs propel Syracuse’s win over Cal
-
In its 33-25 win over Cal, SU was propelled by first-quarter interceptions
from Marlowe Wax and Davien Kerr, helping it open to a 13-0 lead. Continue
rea...
18 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment