So how bad do I do? You can read them here
Final BE Standings
Cincy 11-2 (6-1) had them 8-5 (4-3)
Pitt 9-3 (5-2) had them 6-6 (2-5)
WV 8-4 (5-2) had them 10-2 (7-0)
RU 7-5 (5-2) had them 7-5 (3-4)
UConn 7-5 (3-4) had them 6-6 (2-5)
USF 7-5 (2-5) had them 9-3 (5-2)
SU 3-9 (1-6) had us 5-7 (3-4)
Louisville 5-7 (1-6) had them 7-5 (2-5)
Cincy won the BE. I had them in third place. The games I got wrong were: @WV (26-23), @UL (28-20), and @Hawaii (29-4). I had Cincy losing all 3.
Second place was a 3 way tie between Pitt, WV, and RU. For Pitt I missed @SU (34-24), @USF (26-21), @ND (36-33 OT), WV (19-15), @UConn (34-10) which I had them losing, as well as Bowling Green (17-27), RU (54-34) which I had them winning. For WV I missed @ECU (3-24), Cincy (23-26), @Pitt (15-19) as games I picked them to W and Auburn (34-17) as a game I picked them to lose. I got RUs overall record dead right. However I missed teh BE record and the following games: @Pitt (54-34), @USF (49-16) in which they won and UNC (12-44), @Navy (21-23) in which they lost.
UConn is next finishing 5th. I missed @Louisville (26-21), @SU (39-14) in which they won and Pitt (10-34) in which the lost.
Then comes USF. Boy was I wrong on them. I missed Pitt (21-26), @Louisville (20-24), RU (16-49) in which they lost and KU (37-34) in which they won.
Tied for last place were SU and Louisville (hey at least we werent alone). For SU I missed Akron (28-42), Pitt (24-34), UConn (14-39) in which SU lost and @ND (24-23) in which SU won. Finally we have Louisville. I missed UK (2-27), UConn (21-26), Cincy (20-28) in which they lost and USF (24-20) in which they won.
1st-quarter INTs propel Syracuse’s win over Cal
-
In its 33-25 win over Cal, SU was propelled by first-quarter interceptions
from Marlowe Wax and Davien Kerr, helping it open to a 13-0 lead. Continue
rea...
13 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment